Case 2201498/2020 · Employment Tribunal
MR IN DA SILVA JARDIM v Fortnum and Mason plc — 2020
- Case reference
- 2201498/2020
- Decision date
- 22 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MR IN DA SILVA JARDIM
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mr In Da Silva Jardim's claim of unfair dismissal against Fortnum and Mason plc was well founded and succeeded. The written record states that the reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
On remedy, the tribunal recorded the claimant as aged 39 with 12 years' service and a gross weekly wage of £439.42. It awarded a basic award of £2,636.53 after deducting 50% for contributory fault, and a compensatory award of £778.04 for one month's loss of earnings of £1,556.07 after the same 50% reduction. The total award was £3,414.57.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held the unfair dismissal claim was well founded. A 50% reduction for the claimant's contributory fault was applied to both the basic award and compensatory award. | Upheld | — | £3,415 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,415
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,637
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £778
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.