Case 2201577/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Hussain v Cocoon Global Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2201577/2021
- Decision date
- 23 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Norris
- Venue
- Central London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Hussain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Norris, sitting alone via CVP at Central London on 23 August 2021, held that Mr I Hussain’s unlawful deduction from wages claim succeeded. The tribunal found that he had been underpaid by 25 pence per hour since February 2021. The shortfall was adjusted to account for furlough, by agreement, and was assessed at £177.36.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had incurred financial loss as a result of the underpayments and late payments, quantified at £232.32. On that basis, the respondent, Cocoon Global Limited, was ordered to pay £409.68 in total. Oral reasons were given at the hearing and written reasons were not provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the claimant had been underpaid by 25 pence per hour since February 2021. The underpayment was adjusted to account for furlough by agreement, producing a shortfall of £177.36, and the claimant also incurred £232.32 in financial loss from underpayments and late payments. | Upheld | — | £410 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £410
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.