Case 2201583/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Rana Al Moosa v University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 2201583/2024
- Decision date
- 24 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Rana Al Moosa
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a CVP hearing on 18 July 2024, Employment Judge J S Burns refused the claimant's application to amend her claim by adding the material in the document entitled "Response to ET 27 June 2024". The judge recorded that the claimant had already been granted leave, by consent, to amend in respect of much of the material previously identified in the case management process, but that the later 25-page version was filed four weeks after the deadline set by EJ Sugarman and sought to merge existing issues with a wider and less structured set of allegations.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the ET1 disclosed an ordinary unfair dismissal claim only. The amendment application dated 28/6/24 was refused, and the unfair dismissal claim was then struck out because the claimant did not have two years' service and the claim had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Selkent
- Vaughan v Mobility Partnerships
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.