Case 2202050/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Swapna v Vision Security Group Limited and 4 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 2202050/2019
- Decision date
- 13 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin
Parties
6 namedClaimant
Ms M Swapna
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 5 December 2019, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claims against the Second Respondent, PCSO Tricia Reynolds, and the Fifth Respondent, DC Dylan Enright, should not be struck out. The judgment records that those individuals were said not to be employers or colleagues of the claimant.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out all claims against the Second Respondent and Fifth Respondent. The remaining claims were left listed for a preliminary hearing on 16 January 2020. No monetary remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | All claims against the Second Respondent, PCSO Tricia Reynolds, and the Fifth Respondent, DC Dylan Enright, were struck out under rule 37. The judgment does not identify the substantive claim types in this order. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.