Case 2202100/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Royal v Leadec Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2202100/2019
- Decision date
- 6 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JL Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Royal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 22 October 2019, the respondent applied for the claim to be struck out on the basis that the claimant had failed to comply with the Tribunal’s order of 1 October 2019 and was not actively pursuing the case. The claimant was told to send any objections as soon as possible.
The Tribunal noted that the claimant was reminded of the application on 29 October and 18 November 2019, but made no contact with the Tribunal. The Employment Judge held that the failure to comply had not been remedied and that the claimant’s silence demonstrated a failure actively to pursue the proceedings.
The claim was therefore struck out under rule 37 because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal’s order dated 1 October 2019 and the claim had not been actively pursued. The hearing listed for 9 December 2019 did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause or causes of action; it records only that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37 for non-compliance and failure to actively pursue it. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- not actively pursued
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.