Case 2202400/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Messi v LVMH Services UK Ltd & others — 2022
- Case reference
- 2202400/2022
- Decision date
- 5 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Messi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing on 4 October 2022 before Employment Judge A M Snelson sitting alone, the claimant did not attend. The tribunal struck out the breach of contract claim, the holiday pay claim, the sex discrimination claim and alternative equal pay claim, and the direct race discrimination claim and alternative race-related harassment claim, all on the basis that they had no reasonable prospect of success.
The tribunal also struck out the victimisation claim except for the allegation relying on the email of 4 May 2022 as the protected act and the decision implemented on 5 May 2022 to end the claimant's engagement as the detriment. That surviving allegation was the only live claim after the hearing. The claimant's implicit application to amend the claim form to add race discrimination based on an alleged pay difference with Ms Millac was refused.
The tribunal said it would make a deposit order in respect of the remaining victimisation allegation, but before doing so it would invite the claimant to make representations about means and provide supporting evidence. A further case management hearing was listed for 25 November 2022, subject to whether the parties agreed that it could be vacated.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The complaint covered notice pay and any alleged breach of policy or procedure; struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Pleaded in the alternative with equal pay; struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Equal pay | Alternative to the sex discrimination claim; struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Pleaded in the alternative with race-related harassment; struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Harassment | Race-related harassment claim; struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Victimisation | Struck out except for the allegation relying on the email of 4 May 2022 as the protected act and the decision implemented on 5 May 2022 to terminate the claimant's engagement as the detriment, which remained live. |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.