Case 2202633/2018 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mr N McIntosh and others (2) Ms A Durant and others (3) Mr L Dosanjh and others v HM Prison and Probation Service and 3 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 2202633/2018
- Decision date
- 12 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Elliott JUDGMENT
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
5 namedClaimant
(1) Mr N McIntosh and others (2) Ms A Durant and others (3) Mr L Dosanjh and others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy consent, the tribunal recorded that the claimants are entitled, pursuant to section 61 of the Equality Act 2010, to be treated as satisfying paragraph 12(2)(b), read with paragraph 9(1), of Schedule 2 to the Public Service (Civil Servants and Others) Pension Regulations 2014.
The entitlement was stated to take effect from 1 April 2015. The judgment does not set out contested findings, reasons, monetary remedies, or a discrimination characteristic in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Judgment by consent records entitlement under section 61 of the Equality Act 2010 in relation to pension regulations. The extracted judgment text does not expressly identify the pleaded protected characteristic or label the claim as age or sex discrimination. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 61 of the Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.