Case 2202711/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr R Cater, Litigation Consultant Manager — 2023
- Case reference
- 2202711/2022
- Decision date
- 21 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kenward
- Panel members
- Ms J Kiely, Mr T Cook
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting before Employment Judge Kenward with Ms J Kiely and Mr T Cook, held that the complaint of victimisation contrary to section 27 of the Equality Act 2010 was well-founded and succeeded against both respondents. The tribunal ordered the respondents, jointly and severally, to compensate the claimant for victimisation.
The extracted judgment records that the complaints of discrimination under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 and harassment under section 26 were dismissed against both respondents as out of time. The extracted text does not identify the protected characteristic underlying the section 13 complaint.
The compensation for victimisation was £14,353.61 in total. That sum comprised £9,900 for injury to feelings, £1,056.72 interest on the injury-to-feelings award, £3,225 for financial loss, and £171.89 interest on the financial loss award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | Held well-founded under Equality Act 2010 section 27 against both respondents, who were jointly and severally liable for the compensation awarded. | Upheld | — | £14,354 |
| Other | Section 13 discrimination complaint dismissed as out of time; the extracted judgment text does not identify the protected characteristic. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Harassment | Section 26 harassment complaint dismissed as out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,354
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,225
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- Equality Act 2010 section 27
- Equality Act 2010 section 13
- Equality Act 2010 section 26
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.