Case 2202735/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss F Liburd v London Underground Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2202735/2019
- Decision date
- 10 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Grewal
- Venue
- London Central
- Panel members
- Mr D Carter, Mr D Kendall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss F Liburd
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal unanimously found that Miss Liburd's complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded. The written judgment records the outcome but not the detailed reasons, as reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The Tribunal also unanimously found that the complaints of disability discrimination under sections 15, 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010 were not well-founded. The Tribunal ordered the Claimant to pay the Respondent's costs in the sum of £14,010.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the complaints of disability discrimination under sections 15, 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010 were not well-founded. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,010
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- sections 15, 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.