Case 2202947/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S I Zaidi v London School of Economics and Political Science and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 2202947/2019
- Decision date
- 13 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr S I Zaidi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Davidson at London Central on 8 January 2020. The tribunal refused the Second Respondent’s application to be removed as a party, and recorded that any issues about time limits would be dealt with at the full merits hearing.
The only substantive claim disposed of in this judgment was the Claimant’s victimisation claim. The tribunal struck that claim out on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success. The written record does not set out full reasons because reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were provided in the record.
The judgment also records that the Claimant confirmed he was not pursuing a stand-alone constructive unfair dismissal claim. No monetary remedy was assessed or awarded in this preliminary decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | Struck out at the preliminary hearing as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.