Case 2203632/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T O Pivasu v Virgin Active Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2203632/2021
- Decision date
- 23 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brown Appearances
- Venue
- Central London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T O Pivasu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr T O Pivasu, brought a claim against Virgin Active Limited for unlawful deductions from wages. The tribunal heard the case at Central London by CVP on 23 November 2022 before Employment Judge Brown. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel, with a Romanian interpreter present.
The judgment records that the respondent did not contest the claimant’s claim for unlawful deductions from wages in the sum of £6,513 net. On that basis, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £6,513 net. No other claims, findings, or remedy components are recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent did not contest the claimant’s claim for unlawful deductions from wages in the sum of £6,513 net. | Upheld | — | £6,513 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,513
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.