Case 2203710/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Nunn v Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 2203710/2021
- Decision date
- 2 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Baty
- Venue
- London Central
- Panel members
- Mrs C Marsters, Mr D Shaw
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Nunn
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs C Nunn’s claims against Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust were heard at London Central before Employment Judge Baty, sitting with Mrs C Marsters and Mr D Shaw. The tribunal first dealt with a complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments at issue 11(c) of the list of issues. It found that complaint had been presented out of time and that it was not just and equitable to extend time, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it and dismissed it.
The tribunal added that, even if it had had jurisdiction, that reasonable-adjustments complaint would have failed. It then held that the claimant’s remaining complaints, identified as unfair dismissal, direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, and failure to make reasonable adjustments, also failed. No monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments at issue 11(c). The tribunal held it was presented out of time and that it was not just and equitable to extend time, so it had no jurisdiction to hear it. The tribunal also said it would have failed on the merits if jurisdiction had existed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Remaining complaint dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination complaint dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability complaint dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Reasonable adjustments complaint referred to among the remaining complaints was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.