Case 2203764/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Levinna Ola v Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust — 2019
- Case reference
- 2203764/2019
- Decision date
- 27 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Levinna Ola
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records a partial withdrawal. The complaints of unfair dismissal, failure to pay redundancy pay, breach of contract in relation to notice pay, and a standalone claim for bullying were dismissed following withdrawal by the Claimant.
The judgment states that the Claimant's remaining claim or claims would proceed to hearing pursuant to the order made on 27 November 2019. It does not identify those remaining claims or determine any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Judgment records the complaint was dismissed following withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | Judgment records the complaint was dismissed following withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract claim related to notice pay. Judgment records the complaint was dismissed following withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Judgment describes this as a standalone claim for bullying and records it was dismissed following withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.