Case 2203975/2010 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Vatish v Crown Prosecution Service and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2203975/2010
- Decision date
- 13 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs A Vatish
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing at London Central on 13 August 2021, Employment Judge Snelson, sitting alone, heard counsel for Mrs A Vatish and for the respondents, the Crown Prosecution Service and People Resolutions Ltd.
The Tribunal struck out all claims in the listed proceedings alleging victimisation and/or whistle-blowing, including any claim of unfair dismissal under Employment Rights Act 1996, s103A. It also struck out claims alleging any tortious act based on the conduct and/or outcome of Ms Boot's March to December 2009 investigation into the claimant's internal grievance. The stated grounds were that those claims were vexatious and/or had no reasonable prospect of success.
The remaining claims were not finally determined in this judgment. They were stayed until the claimant paid in full all sums, including interest, due under the costs order in case numbers 2222529/2009 and 2202228/2010, or until further order of the Tribunal. No remedy award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | All claims alleging victimisation in the listed proceedings were struck out as vexatious and/or having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | All claims alleging whistle-blowing, including any claim of unfair dismissal under Employment Rights Act 1996, s103A, were struck out as vexatious and/or having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | Claims alleging any tortious act based on the conduct and/or outcome of Ms Boot's March to December 2009 investigation into the Claimant's internal grievance were struck out as vexatious and/or having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Rights Act 1996, s103A
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.