Case 2204316/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Grillo v Savestay plc London Central: 25 and 26 August 2021 — 2021
- Case reference
- 2204316/2020
- Decision date
- 26 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicolle
- Panel members
- Mr T Cook, Mr P Secher
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Grillo
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting before Employment Judge Nicolle with Mr T Cook and Mr P Secher on 25 and 26 August 2021, heard Mr O Grillo's claims against Savestay Plc. The written decision records claims for direct race discrimination under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010, harassment under section 26, victimisation under section 27, and unfair dismissal.
All claims were dismissed. The tribunal gave oral reasons to the parties on 26 August 2021. The extracted written record does not set out further findings of fact or any financial remedy, and no award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The judgment does not separately restate the protected characteristic for the harassment claim; it is tagged as race because the case was listed as race discrimination and the harassment claim was brought under the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 Equality Act 2010
- s.26 Equality Act 2010
- s.27 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.