Case 2204676/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Mr A Findley, counsel For the v Respondent — 2024

Case reference: 2204676/2022
Decision date: 6 December 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge P Klimov Tribunal
Panel members: C Marsters, Dr V Weerasinghe

Indexed: 17 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

Mr A Findley, counsel For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal recorded that the claimant withdrew complaints of indirect disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, harassment related to disability, specified direct disability discrimination allegations, specified discrimination arising from disability allegations, and a specified victimisation allegation. Those complaints were dismissed having been withdrawn.

The Tribunal dismissed the remaining complaints of direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, and victimisation as not well-founded. It also found that the Equality Act discrimination complaints had no reasonable prospect of success and ordered the claimant to pay the respondent 3000 pounds in costs.

By majority judgment, the Tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal complaint under sections 94 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 as not well-founded.

Claims and outcomes

6 findings recorded

This case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	Complaints of indirect disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, specified allegations of direct disability discrimination, and specified allegations of discrimination arising from disability were dismissed having been withdrawn by the claimant.	Withdrawn	Disability	—
Harassment	Harassment related to disability was dismissed having been withdrawn by the claimant.	Withdrawn	Disability	—
Victimisation	A specified victimisation allegation concerning sickness absence meetings on 7 February 2022 and 5 October 2022 was dismissed having been withdrawn by the claimant.	Withdrawn	—	—
Disability discrimination	The remaining complaints of direct disability discrimination and discrimination arising from disability were not well-founded and dismissed.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Victimisation	The remaining victimisation complaints were not well-founded and dismissed.	Dismissed	—	—
Unfair dismissal

Legal tests applied

9 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.