Case 2204815/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Diaz v London United Busways Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2204815/2019
- Decision date
- 28 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Stout
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Diaz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant had been ordered by Employment Judge Stout on 28 April 2020 to pay deposits. The judgment records that the claimant did not pay those deposits.
As a result, the tribunal struck out the claimant's harassment claims under the Equality Act 2010 and his claims under the Employment Rights Act 1996 and Employment Relations Act 1999. The strike-out was made under Rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013, as amended.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The judgment identifies harassment under the Equality Act 2010 but does not state the protected characteristic. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The judgment refers only to claims under the Employment Rights Act 1996 and does not identify the specific cause of action in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The judgment refers only to claims under the Employment Relations Act 1999 and does not identify the specific cause of action in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.