Case 2204969/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Agili-Odion v Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 2204969/2023
- Decision date
- 5 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Singh
- Venue
- London Central
- Panel members
- Ms S Plummer, Mr P Secher
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Agili-Odion
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at London Central before Employment Judge Singh, with Ms S Plummer and Mr P Secher as the panel members, on 14-16 February 2024 in person and 19-21 February 2024 via CVP. The judgment records that all complaints were dismissed as not well-founded: direct race discrimination, direct age discrimination, constructive discriminatory dismissal, detriment for making a protected disclosure, and automatic unfair (constructive) dismissal under s.103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The written record does not set out the tribunal's detailed reasons. It states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested, so this extract supports the formal outcomes and the statutory basis of the protected disclosure dismissal, but not a fuller narrative of the tribunal's factual or legal reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states: 'The complaint of direct race discrimination is not well-founded and is dismissed.' | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Age discrimination | The judgment states: 'The complaint of direct age discrimination is not well-founded and is dismissed.' | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states: 'The complaint of constructive discriminatory dismissal is not well-founded and is dismissed.' | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states: 'The complaint of being subjected to detriment for making a protected disclosure is not well-founded and is dismissed.' | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states: 'The complaint of automatic unfair (constructive) dismissal under s.103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996, is not well-founded and is dismissed.' | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.