Case 2205570/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms I Chukanova v Servest Group Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 2205570/2018
- Decision date
- 26 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Norris
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms I Chukanova
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs I Chukanova brought a claim against Servest Group Limited for unlawful deductions from wages. Employment Judge Norris sat alone at London Central on 23 November 2018. The Respondent did not appear or send representation, and the judgment records that no response had been presented within time and that the Respondent had indicated by email that it did not defend the claim.
Default judgment was entered in the Claimant’s favour and the unlawful deductions from wages claim succeeded. The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay £902 in total, made up of £788 for 98.5 hours’ pay at £8 per hour, less any applicable deductions, and £114 by way of a preparation time order, calculated at three hours at £38 per hour.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Default judgment was entered because no response was presented in time and the Respondent said by email that it did not defend the claim. | Upheld | — | £902 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £902
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.