Case 2206299/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Kaur v Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 2206299/2023
- Decision date
- 7 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Kaur
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs R Kaur brought a complaint against Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust under s.11 Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment records that the hearing took place remotely at London Central on 31 July 2024 before Employment Judge B Smith, sitting alone, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr R Moretto, Counsel.
The tribunal held that the s.11 Employment Rights Act 1996 complaint was not well-founded and dismissed it. The judgment does not record any monetary award, declaration, or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes the claim only as a complaint under s.11 Employment Rights Act 1996 and says it was not well-founded and dismissed. The claim type is classified as unlawful_deduction_wages in line with the listing category, but the judgment itself does not give further factual detail. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.11 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.