Case 2206484/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs.H. Almousawi v Daitien Diamonds Ltd and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 2206484/2018
- Decision date
- 28 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Goodman
- Venue
- London Central
- Panel members
- Mr. G.W. Bishop, Mr. G. Corbert
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs.H. Almousawi
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the first and second respondents harassed the claimant in relation to sex, race and religion, and that they victimised her for complaining about that harassment. It also recorded no award on the claimant's breach of contract claim as to notice, and no award for the failure to provide a statutory notice of contract terms.
On remedy, the tribunal found that the respondent had conducted the proceedings unreasonably and ordered costs of £6,300 for counsel, £5,500 for a solicitor, and £2,360 VAT, making a total of £14,160. It declined to order a penalty under section 12A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | Judgment found the first and second respondents harassed the claimant related to sex. | Upheld | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Judgment found the first and second respondents harassed the claimant related to race. | Upheld | Race | — |
| Harassment | Judgment found the first and second respondents harassed the claimant related to religion. | Upheld | Religion or belief | — |
| Victimisation | Judgment found the respondents victimised the claimant for complaining of harassment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment recorded no award on the claim for breach of contract as to notice. | Other | — | — |
| Other | The judgment recorded no award for failing to provide a statutory notice of contract terms. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,160
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 12A Employment Tribunals Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.