Case 2206546/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person (Mr J Bright, partner) For the v Mr S Hoyle, Consultant (Croner) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2206546/2018
- Decision date
- 23 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ms
- Venue
- Central London
- Panel members
- Mr PM Secher, Mr J Carroll
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person (Mr J Bright, partner) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Central London on 20-22 January 2020 before Employment Judge Ms H Norris, sitting with lay members Mr PM Secher and Mr J Carroll. The Claimant was represented in person by Mr J Bright, and the Respondent was represented by Mr S Hoyle. In the judgment sent to the parties on 23 January 2020, the tribunal unanimously found that the Claimant's claim was not well-founded and dismissed it.
The extracted text contains no further reasons, findings on liability issues, or monetary award. No remedy was recorded in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying legal basis of the claim; it records only that the Claimant's claim was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.