Case 2206576/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Sultan v Outdoor and Cycle Concepts Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2206576/2018
- Decision date
- 30 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Goodman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Sultan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Goodman issued a brief Rule 52 judgment dated 29 May 2019. It states that the proceedings were dismissed because the claimant withdrew the claim. The extracted text does not contain any findings on liability, evidence, or the merits of the underlying claims.
No remedy was awarded and no monetary figures are recorded in the extracted judgment. The decision is limited to the procedural dismissal following withdrawal, so the record does not show any substantive tribunal determination on the unfair dismissal or religion or belief discrimination allegations.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment is a short Rule 52 withdrawal judgment. It records that the proceedings were dismissed after the claimant withdrew the claim, but it does not set out any merits findings for this head. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The extracted judgment is a short Rule 52 withdrawal judgment. It records that the proceedings were dismissed after the claimant withdrew the claim, but it does not set out any merits findings for this head. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.