Case 2206774/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Silva v Marriott Hotels Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2206774/2018
- Decision date
- 29 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Grewal
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Silva
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis rule 52 judgment, issued by Employment Judge Grewal on 27 June 2019, records that the proceedings in case 2206774/2018 were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by Mr N Silva. The judgment does not contain findings on liability, evidence, or remedy.
The short judgment does not set out the pleaded complaints in detail. The supplied listing context identifies age discrimination, disability discrimination, race discrimination, and unfair dismissal among the proceedings, but the judgment itself only records the dismissal following withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The individual complaint type is taken from the supplied listing context because the short judgment does not set out pleaded particulars. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The individual complaint type is taken from the supplied listing context because the short judgment does not set out pleaded particulars. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The individual complaint type is taken from the supplied listing context because the short judgment does not set out pleaded particulars. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The individual complaint type is taken from the supplied listing context because the short judgment does not set out pleaded particulars. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.