Case 2206903/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. A. J. Garay Vargas v Crystal Services plc — 2021
- Case reference
- 2206903/2020
- Decision date
- 14 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. A. J. Garay Vargas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by Employment Judge P Klimov sitting alone at London Central on 14 June 2021. The claimant was represented by Mr Finnian Clarke of UVW and the respondent by Mr Jeffrey Underwood, the respondent’s general manager. The tribunal recorded that the remote format was not objected to and that a face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all issues could be determined remotely.
The written judgment does not set out the underlying factual dispute or any detailed reasons because reasons had been given orally at the hearing and written reasons were only to be provided if requested. The judgment records a single outcome: the claimant’s claim failed.
Accordingly, the tribunal dismissed the claim. No monetary award, liability split, or separate remedy figure is recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.