Case 2207119/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Curry v Orsatech Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2207119/2021
- Decision date
- 9 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wade Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Curry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. The tribunal therefore considered the ET1 under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013 and determined the claim without a hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages to the claimant and ordered payment of £5,800, with tax and national insurance to be accounted for to HMRC. | Upheld | — | £5,800 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal stated that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,800
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.