Case 2207226/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N De Mata v PGD Food Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2207226/2021
- Decision date
- 22 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N De Mata
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response to the claim was presented, despite service on the respondent and a further email from the tribunal to an email address supplied by the claimant. The tribunal therefore determined the case under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013 on the basis of the material before it.
The claimant’s complaints of unpaid wages and holiday pay succeeded. The tribunal recorded that the award was to be paid by the respondent before tax and comprised 185.76 hours of unpaid wages at £12 per hour and 49.30 hours of unpaid holiday pay at £12 per hour.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Succeeded under Rule 21 after no response was presented by the respondent. | Upheld | — | £2,229 |
| Holiday pay | Succeeded under Rule 21 after no response was presented by the respondent. | Upheld | — | £592 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,821
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.