Case 2207507/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms B Nunhoo, Solicitor For the v Mr S Crawford — 2022
- Case reference
- 2207507/2021
- Decision date
- 1 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms B Nunhoo, Solicitor For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 1 August 2022 before Employment Judge P Klimov sitting alone, the Tribunal dealt with the claimant’s age, race and disability discrimination claims, together with unfair dismissal and wages claims. The claimant’s application to amend the discrimination claims was dismissed upon withdrawal.
The Tribunal then recorded that the claimant’s age, race and disability discrimination claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. No substantive liability findings were made on those claims in the extracted decision.
The Tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the claimant’s unfair dismissal and wages claims, and dismissed those claims for lack of jurisdiction. It also found that the claimant had acted vexatiously and unreasonably by continuing to pursue his claims after 21 April 2022.
As a result of that conduct, the claimant was ordered to pay the respondent £6,800 in respect of the respondent’s legal costs. The Tribunal made no wasted costs order against the claimant’s representative.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The claimant’s application to amend his age discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal, and the age discrimination claim itself was also dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal said it did not have jurisdiction to consider the unfair dismissal claim, so it was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The Tribunal dismissed the claimant’s 'wages claims' for lack of jurisdiction; the extracted text does not specify a more particular statutory category. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,800
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.