Case 2207877/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v London & Quadrant Housing Trust — 2021
- Case reference
- 2207877/2020
- Decision date
- 2 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin
- Panel members
- Mr P de Chamont Rambert, Mr R Baber
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Mohamed Lahkim brought claims against London & Quadrant Housing Trust. The tribunal, sitting with Employment Judge Adkin, Mr P de Chamont Rambert and Mr R Baber, heard the case at London Central Employment Tribunal by CVP on 29 and 30 November and 1 and 2 December 2021.
The judgment records that the claim of constructive unfair dismissal pursuant to sections 95 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well founded and was dismissed. It also records that the claim of automatic constructive unfair dismissal pursuant to section 100 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well founded and was dismissed.
The tribunal further dismissed the claim of indirect race discrimination contrary to section 19 of the Equality Act 2010, finding it was not well founded. The judgment does not record any remedy award, and it states that written reasons had to be requested within 14 days of the date the judgment was sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment records this as a claim of constructive unfair dismissal pursuant to sections 95 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records this as a claim of automatic constructive unfair dismissal pursuant to section 100 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records this as a claim of indirect race discrimination contrary to section 19 of the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- sections 95 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 100 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 19 of the Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.