Case 2208799/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Mrs N Targonska v Get My Slice Partners LLP and 2 others — 2024

Case reference: 2208799/2022
Decision date: 12 September 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge B Smith
Venue: London Central
Panel members: Ms Campbell, Mr Greenland

Indexed: 25 April 2026

Parties

4 named

Claimant

Mrs N Targonska

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Employment Judge B Smith, sitting with members Ms Campbell and Mr Greenland, gave a unanimous reserved judgment partially upholding the claimant's claims against the first respondent (Get My Slice Partners LLP) and second respondent (Mr O Southgate). Three discrete acts of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability under s.15 EqA 2010 succeeded against R1 and R2: not paying full monthly drawings during sickness absence (only SSP), cutting the claimant's expenses, and not communicating about starting SSP. Complaints against the third respondent (My Zero-One Technologies Limited) were dismissed.

All other discrimination claims (failure to make reasonable adjustments, direct marital status discrimination, direct race discrimination, harassment, victimisation) were not well founded and were dismissed. The unauthorised deductions from wages claim succeeded against R1 (£5,715.43 for May-July 2022 and £9,136.32 for the tax year 2021/22). The holiday pay claim also succeeded against R1, with a 25% uplift under s.207A TULR(C)A 1992 for unreasonable failure to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures.

The PDF was truncated at 15,000 of 122,581 characters; remedy quantification beyond the wages figures and any final aggregate award could not be confirmed from the extracted text.

Claims and outcomes

8 findings recorded

This case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	Discrimination arising from disability (s.15 EqA 2010) upheld in part against R1 and R2 (sick pay treatment, expense cuts, and failure to communicate about SSP). Other unfavourable treatment complaints dismissed; complaints against R3 dismissed. PDF text truncated at 15,000 of 122,581 chars - remedy figures not in extracted portion.	Upheld	Disability	—
Disability discrimination	Failure to make reasonable adjustments (ss.20 and 21 EqA 2010) - not well founded.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Marriage or civil partnership discrimination	Direct marital status discrimination (s.13 EqA 2010) - not well founded.	Dismissed	Marriage / civil partnership	—
Race discrimination	Direct race discrimination (s.13 EqA 2010) - not well founded.	Dismissed	Race	—
Harassment	Harassment related to disability or race (s.26 EqA 2010) - not well founded.	Dismissed	—	—
Victimisation	Victimisation - not well founded.

Legal tests applied

7 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.