Case 2208870/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Littlestar Services Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2208870/2022
- Decision date
- 25 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leonard-Johnston On
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing before Employment Judge Leonard-Johnston on 25 May 2023, the tribunal considered Mr K Turner’s claims of race discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010 and harassment related to race under section 26 Equality Act 2010. It held that both claims had been brought outside the relevant statutory time limits and that it was not just and equitable to extend time, so both claims were dismissed.
The tribunal also considered a claim of protected disclosure detriment under section 47B Employment Rights Act 1996. It found that this claim was brought outside the relevant statutory time limits and that it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been brought within time, so it was dismissed. The decision record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Dismissed because the claim was brought outside the relevant statutory time limit and the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Dismissed because the claim was brought outside the relevant statutory time limit and the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Whistleblowing | Dismissed because the protected disclosure detriment claim under s.47B ERA was brought outside the relevant statutory time limit and the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for it to have been brought within time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- just and equitable extension of time
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.