Case 2209016/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Mambetova v John Lewis plc — 2023
- Case reference
- 2209016/2022
- Decision date
- 13 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N Walker Date
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Mambetova
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claimant's claim for indirect discrimination on the ground that it had no reasonable prospects of success. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested.
The claimant's claim for discrimination pursuant to section 18 of the Equality Act 2010 was not determined in this judgment. The tribunal stated that it remains and will proceed to a hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claimant's claim for indirect discrimination was struck out because it had no reasonable prospects of success. The protected characteristic for that indirect discrimination claim is not specified in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant's claim for discrimination pursuant to section 18 of the Equality Act 2010 remains and will proceed to a hearing; no final outcome is recorded for that claim in this judgment. | Other | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.