Case 2209280/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Ahmed v Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis — 2024
- Case reference
- 2209280/2023
- Decision date
- 31 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Smith
- Venue
- London Central
- Panel members
- Mrs Marsters, Mr Baber
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Ahmed
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting with members, heard the case at London Central and gave a unanimous judgment. It upheld one complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability and dismissed the remaining reasonable-adjustments complaint. The successful complaint was confined to the respondent's failure to put in place a non-permanent structure under which the claimant's arrangement of working entirely from home would be reviewed periodically, such as every six months.
The tribunal also upheld one complaint of harassment related to disability and dismissed the remaining harassment complaints. The successful harassment finding was based on the respondent requesting and pressuring the claimant to return to working in the office on 18 May 2023. The judgment does not record any monetary award, and no split remedy figures are set out in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability: the tribunal found well-founded the complaint that the respondent did not implement a non-permanent structure under which the claimant's arrangement of working entirely from home would be reviewed periodically, such as every 6 months. The remaining reasonable adjustments complaint was dismissed. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to disability: the tribunal found well-founded the complaint that the respondent requested and pressured the claimant to return to working in the office on 18 May 2023. The remaining harassment complaints were dismissed. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.