Case 2210423/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Devon Miller For the v All claims of direct race discrimination fail and are dismissed. and 3 others — 2025
- Case reference
- 2210423/2023
- Decision date
- 18 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hodgson Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
5 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought allegations under the Equality Act 2010 arising from workplace events including comments about a chair and food, an alcohol breath test, grievance outcomes, notices of conversation, disclosure of statements, probation, and dismissal. The tribunal identified claims of direct race discrimination, direct age discrimination, harassment related to race, and victimisation.
The tribunal found that some alleged treatment was not established. Where treatment was established, it found the respondent had provided an explanation and that the treatment was not because of race, age, or the protected act. For harassment, the tribunal found the alleged treatment was not shown to have the required purpose or effect and did not relate to race.
The tribunal proceeded on the basis that the grievance of 9 July 2022 was a protected act, but found none of the alleged treatment was because of that protected act. All claims failed on their merits and were dismissed, so the tribunal did not need to decide time-limit issues.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination allegations 1 to 13 were dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Age discrimination | Direct age discrimination allegations 7, 8, and 13 were dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to race allegations 1 to 12 were dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation allegations 3 to 13 were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 Equality Act 2010
- s.26 Equality Act 2010
- s.27 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.