Case 2213057/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 2213057/2023
- Decision date
- 18 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O Segal KC
- Panel members
- Mr P de Chaumont-Rambert, Mr J Carroll
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place at London Central by CVP on 8 to 10 July 2024 before Employment Judge O Segal KC sitting with members Mr P de Chaumont-Rambert and Mr J Carroll. Ms Y Pemberton appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr M White, counsel.
The tribunal unanimously dismissed Ms Pemberton's claims of discrimination, harassment, victimisation and failure to make reasonable adjustments under the Equality Act 2010. The judgment records no separate liability findings, remedy findings or monetary award beyond dismissal of the claims.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Disability discrimination complaint. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments complaint under the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment complaint under the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation complaint under the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.