Case 2213092/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms W Mundowa v WKCIC Group t/a Capital City College Group — 2024
- Case reference
- 2213092/2024
- Decision date
- 18 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anthony REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms W Mundowa
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London Central Employment Tribunal by CVP on 11 June 2024 before Employment Judge Anthony. The claimant, Ms W Mundowa, did not attend. The respondent, WKCIC Group t/a Capital City College Group, was represented by Ms D Humphries of Shakespeare Martineau.
The tribunal recorded that it had regard to the available information and that attempts had been made to contact the claimant. On that basis, and because of the claimant's non-attendance, the tribunal dismissed the claim pursuant to rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment does not record any findings on the substantive merits of the underlying claim or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not identify the substantive cause of action. The tribunal dismissed the claim under rule 47 after the claimant did not attend, having regard to the available information and attempts to contact the claimant. Gov.uk lists the case under unlawful deduction from wages, but that is not stated in the judgment text provided. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.