Case 2213193/2023 · Employment Tribunal
1. Amparo Escobar Bolanos 2. Luzdary Garces Vargas 3. Juan Martin Ledesma 4. Stephany Nieto Granada v London School of Economics and Political Science — 2025
- Case reference
- 2213193/2023
- Decision date
- 28 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
1. Amparo Escobar Bolanos 2. Luzdary Garces Vargas 3. Juan Martin Ledesma 4. Stephany Nieto Granada
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 10 March 2025, Employment Judge B Smith gave the named claimants an opportunity to explain why their claims should not be struck out for want of active pursuit. They were given 7 days to respond.
The claimants did not respond, did not set out in writing why the claims should not be struck out, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out their claims.
The judgment records that the hearing on 7 April 2025 would proceed only in respect of the remaining claimants.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type(s); it records only that the named claimants' claims were struck out because they had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.