Case 2214039/2023 · Employment Tribunal

Mr Uduje, counsel For the v Respondent — 2023

Case reference: 2214039/2023
Decision date: 19 December 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Spencer

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

Mr Uduje, counsel For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At the hearing on 19 December 2023 before Employment Judge Spencer at London Central, the tribunal determined the claimant's disability discrimination claims. It rejected the claims of direct disability discrimination under section 13 and harassment related to disability under section 26 of the Equality Act 2010.

The tribunal upheld the claims of discrimination arising from disability under section 15 and failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010. The victimisation claim did not succeed.

The issue of remedy for the successful parts of the claim was adjourned to be heard on 22 January 2024 by CVP.

Claims and outcomes

5 findings recorded

This case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	Direct disability discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Harassment	Harassment related to disability under section 26 Equality Act 2010.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Disability discrimination	Discrimination arising from disability under section 15 Equality Act 2010.	Upheld	Disability	—
Disability discrimination	Failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010.	Upheld	Disability	—
Victimisation	Recorded from the judgment.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.