Case 2214516/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 2214516/2023
- Decision date
- 2 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Glennie
- Venue
- London Central
- Panel members
- Ms T Shaah, Mr I McLaughlin
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London Central on 12-14 and 17 June 2024 before Employment Judge Glennie, Ms T Shaah and Mr I McLaughlin. The claimant was represented in person and the respondent by Mr N Price, Counsel.
The Tribunal's unanimous judgment was that the complaints of constructive unfair dismissal, discrimination because of race and sex, harassment related to race and sex, and breach of contract were all dismissed. The extracted judgment provides no further reasoning or remedy assessment beyond that dispositive outcome.
The judgment was dated 24 June 2024 and sent to the parties on 2 July 2024.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment records the complaint as constructive unfair dismissal and dismisses it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records discrimination because of race as dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records discrimination because of sex as dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | The judgment records harassment related to race and sex as dismissed; this entry captures the race aspect. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The judgment records harassment related to race and sex as dismissed; this entry captures the sex aspect. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records breach of contract as dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.