Case 2215309/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Roberts v The Guinness Partnership Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2215309/2023
- Decision date
- 9 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Street Appearances
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Roberts
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 26 March 2024 before Employment Judge Street, the tribunal dealt only with strike-out issues and did not determine the substantive merits of the claims. The claim for unlawful deduction from wages was struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success.
The claim described as unfair constructive dismissal was struck out because it was outside the tribunal's jurisdiction. The tribunal found that it had been brought outside the time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to bring the claim in time, so time was not extended.
The race and disability discrimination claims were also struck out. The tribunal held that they were outside the tribunal's jurisdiction because they were brought outside the time limit, and it was not just and equitable to extend time. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Described as unfair constructive dismissal and struck out because it was outside the tribunal's jurisdiction, was brought outside the time limit, and it was reasonably practicable to bring the claim in time; time was not extended. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Struck out because it was outside the tribunal's jurisdiction, was brought outside the time limit, and it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Disability discrimination | Struck out because it was outside the tribunal's jurisdiction, was brought outside the time limit, and it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- no reasonable prospect of success
- reasonably practicable to bring the claim in time
- just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.