Case 2215378/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Eaton v London Underground Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2215378/2023
- Decision date
- 20 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N Walker Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Eaton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims for unfair dismissal and breach of contract against London Underground Limited. The case was heard at London Central by CVP on 8 and 9 February 2024 before Employment Judge N Walker.
The judgment records that both claims failed and were dismissed. The written record does not set out the tribunal's reasons, stating that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within the specified time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim failed and was dismissed. Reasons were given orally and no written reasons are included in the supplied judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The written judgment states that the breach of contract claim failed and was dismissed. Reasons were given orally and no written reasons are included in the supplied judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.