Case 2216149/2024 · Employment Tribunal

In person For the v Respondent — 2025

Case reference: 2216149/2024
Decision date: 6 October 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Webster Appearances
Venue: London Central

Indexed: 18 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

In person For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded that the claimant brought claims for direct age, race and sex discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010, harassment related to age, race and sex under section 26 Equality Act 2010, and unfair dismissal under section 98 Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment states that each of those claims was not upheld.

The appended final list of issues records that the discrimination and harassment allegations concerned training in April 2020, warnings and disciplinary steps during 2022 and 2023, suspension, dismissal, and alleged micromanagement and scrutiny. It also records that the unfair dismissal issue concerned whether the first respondent dismissed for conduct or some other substantial reason and whether dismissal was reasonable in all the circumstances.

No remedy was awarded in the judgment text provided, and no lay panel members are listed.

Claims and outcomes

7 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Age discrimination	The judgment states that the claimant's claim for direct age discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010 was not upheld.	Dismissed	Age	—
Race discrimination	The judgment states that the claimant's claim for direct race discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010 was not upheld.	Dismissed	Race	—
Sex discrimination	The judgment states that the claimant's claim for direct sex discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010 was not upheld.	Dismissed	Sex	—
Harassment	The judgment states that the claimant's claim for harassment related to age under section 26 Equality Act 2010 was not upheld.	Dismissed	Age	—
Harassment	The judgment states that the claimant's claim for harassment related to race under section 26 Equality Act 2010 was not upheld.	Dismissed	Race	—
Harassment	The judgment states that the claimant's claim for harassment related to sex under section 26 Equality Act 2010 was not upheld.	Dismissed	Sex	—
Unfair dismissal

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.