Case 2217782/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Mavedzenge v North London NHS Foundation Trust — 2026
- Case reference
- 2217782/2024
- Decision date
- 23 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Smith
- Panel members
- Tribunal member Tombs, Tribunal member Moreton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Mavedzenge
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting with members, heard the case over five days in January 2026 at London Central. The unanimous judgment dismissed the claimant's complaints of direct age discrimination, direct race discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments, and unfair dismissal, finding each to be not well-founded.
The complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was upheld in part. The Tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages on 28 February 2024 and ordered the respondent to pay the gross amount of £4,686.71, from which the respondent may deduct any sums due to HMRC for tax or National Insurance.
Any remaining elements of the unauthorised deduction from wages complaint were dismissed as not well-founded and, in the alternative, as having been presented outside the applicable time limit in circumstances where the Tribunal found it had been reasonably practicable to present them in time.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability (s.15 EqA) found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Complaint of unfair dismissal found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages well-founded to the extent of the deduction made on 28 February 2024; respondent ordered to pay £4,686.71 gross (less any tax/NI due to HMRC). Any other element of this complaint was dismissed, in the alternative as out of time, the Tribunal finding it had been reasonably practicable to present in time. | Upheld | — | £4,687 |
| Age discrimination | Direct age discrimination complaint found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination complaint found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Race |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,687
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.