Case 2219232/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Daworaz v G4S Secure Solutions (UK) Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2219232/2023
- Decision date
- 15 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Norris
- Venue
- Central London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Daworaz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the Claimant did not have two years' continuous service as an employee of the Respondent at the date of his dismissal. On that basis, it held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear his claims of unfair dismissal, failure to make a redundancy payment, or notice pay.
The Tribunal also found that the Claimant was not an appropriate representative under section 188(1B) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1998. It therefore held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear his claim concerning failure to consult on a redundancy exercise.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal found it did not have jurisdiction because the Claimant did not have two years' continuous service as an employee of the Respondent at the date of dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The Tribunal found it did not have jurisdiction because the Claimant did not have two years' continuous service as an employee of the Respondent at the date of dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment refers to a notice pay claim. It records that the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear it because the Claimant did not have two years' continuous service. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment refers to a claim of failure to consult on a redundancy exercise. The Tribunal found the Claimant was not an appropriate representative under section 188(1B) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1998 and therefore it did not have jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- two years' continuous service
- section 188(1B) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.