Case 2219387/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Al-Abasi v Ngage Talent UK Employees Limited Full Merits hearing At Victory House — 2025
- Case reference
- 2219387/2024
- Decision date
- 15 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicolle Non
- Panel members
- Ms Z Darmas, Mr R Baber
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Al-Abasi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the Claimant identifies as Muslim and Arab and that his complaint was primarily based on religion. It accepted that the individual managers involved did not know before 5 August 2024 that he was Muslim, but considered the wider context and the corporate Respondent's knowledge relevant to the issues before it.
The Tribunal held that asking the Claimant to remove his LinkedIn post, or face consequences, was related to his religion and had the effect of creating an intimidating and hostile environment. It found that the Respondent's purpose was to maintain its social media policy, but that the effect of the conduct satisfied section 26 Equality Act 2010 in the particular context described in the judgment.
The race discrimination and race harassment claims failed. The Tribunal said it was unnecessary to decide the section 13 religion or belief discrimination claim because of the harassment finding, but that it would have failed. Remedy was not determined, although the Tribunal considered it improbable that the Claimant suffered remuneration or commission loss and indicated that remedy would probably be confined to injury to feelings, subject to further argument.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The claim for harassment on account of race under section 26 Equality Act 2010 failed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | The claim for direct race discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010 failed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The harassment claim on account of the Claimant's Muslim faith succeeded only in relation to being asked to remove the LinkedIn post of 5 August 2024 regarding the Complainant's post and being told to remove the post or face consequences. Other religion-related harassment allegations failed. Remedy was not determined in this judgment. | Upheld | Religion or belief | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The Tribunal stated that, given the upheld harassment finding, it was unnecessary to consider the section 13 Equality Act 2010 religion or belief discrimination claim, but that it would have failed had it been necessary to decide it. | Other | Religion or belief | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment records that the constructive unfair dismissal claim was dismissed on withdrawal at an earlier case management hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 13 Equality Act 2010
- section 26 Equality Act 2010
- Warby
- Carozzi
- Higgs
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.