Case 2219483/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Ramos Da Silva v Hard Rock Cafe UK Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2219483/2024
- Decision date
- 1 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emery REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Ramos Da Silva
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss C Ramos Da Silva, had two periods of employment with Hard Rock Cafe UK Limited: July to December 2022 and 2 August 2023 to 2 May 2024. Her ET1 ticked unfair dismissal only, but she later sought to amend the claim to add race and then sex discrimination and harassment related to race and/or sex. At the hearing she accepted she could not pursue disability discrimination.
Applying Selkent Bus Co Limited v Moore and taking account of MacFarlane and Dethling, the tribunal accepted that the claimant had been treated badly in some respects and that comments and conduct showed poor treatment; it said she may well have been bullied at work. However, it refused the amendment. The 2022 allegations were held to be out of time, there was a five-month break in employment so no continuing act across the gap, and the claimant later accepted the second-period allegations were not race-based.
On the sex discrimination analysis, the tribunal found the claimant could not show less favourable treatment by reference to a male comparator. It noted her own evidence that some men were treated badly and some women were treated well, and that the main factor appeared to be who got on with managers rather than sex. The tribunal therefore treated the proposed discrimination and harassment claims as having no legal merit. The respondent's strike-out application on unfair dismissal succeeded because the claimant accepted she had less than two years' service, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear that claim.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Application to amend to add race discrimination refused; the tribunal held the 2022 allegations were out of time, there was no continuing act across the five-month break in employment, and the claimant later accepted the second-period allegations were not race-based. | Other | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | Application to amend to add sex discrimination refused; the tribunal found the claimant could not show less favourable treatment by reference to a male comparator and considered the proposed claim highly unlikely to succeed. | Other | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Application to amend to add harassment related to sex and/or race refused as part of the same amendment application; the tribunal held the proposed claim had little or no prospect of success. | Other | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Respondent's strike-out application succeeded because the claimant accepted she had less than two years' service, so the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Selkent Bus Co Limited v Moore
- just and equitable
- MacFarlane v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
- Dethling v Metropolitan Police Service
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.