Case 2219511/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Rockson Sackey v The National Centre for Social Research — 2025
- Case reference
- 2219511/2024
- Decision date
- 30 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khan Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Rockson Sackey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in London Central on 28-29 May 2025, Employment Judge Khan determined that the claimant's race-related harassment complaint was not well founded and was dismissed. The tribunal also found that the claimant's age-related harassment complaint was not well founded and dismissed it.
The judgment records that the unauthorised deductions from wages complaint was dismissed on the claimant's withdrawal. No monetary remedy was awarded, and the judgment does not record any split of compensation because none was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The complaint of race-related harassment was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The complaint of age-related harassment was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unauthorised deductions from wages complaint was dismissed on the claimant's withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.