Case 2220735/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Donnan v London Underground Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2220735/2024
- Decision date
- 12 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Forde
- Venue
- London Central in person and hybrid
- Panel members
- Mr D Kendall, Mr S Godcharle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Donnan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal unanimously dismissed the complaint that the claimant was subjected to detriment for making a protected disclosure, finding that it was not well-founded.
The Tribunal also dismissed the complaint of automatic and further dismissal arising from reportedly raised protected disclosures, finding it unfounded. The separate complaint of unfair dismissal was also found unfounded and dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Complaint of being subjected to detriment for making a protected disclosure was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Complaint of automatic and further dismissal arising from reportedly raised protected disclosures was unfounded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Complaint of unfair dismissal was unfounded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.