Case 2221320/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Beaumont v No Ordinary Designer Label Ltd (in Administration) — 2025
- Case reference
- 2221320/2024
- Decision date
- 22 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Baty Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Beaumont
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was made by consent after a joint application by or on behalf of the claimant and respondent. It recorded that the claim was presented against, and the claimant was employed by, No Ordinary Designer Label Limited (in Administration).
For this claim only, the tribunal recorded that No Ordinary Designer Label Limited (in Administration) failed to adequately comply with a requirement of section 188 of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The protective award claim under section 189 succeeded, and the respondent was ordered to pay remuneration to the claimant for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 8 April 2024.
The judgment made no order for any party to pay or reimburse another party's costs or fees, and stated that each party would bear their own costs and fees.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim under section 189 of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 succeeded by consent. The judgment orders remuneration for a protected period of 90 days but does not state a monetary amount. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.