Case 2300121/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Barkass Miss Emma Wright v London Borough of Croydon — 2025
- Case reference
- 2300121/2025
- Decision date
- 26 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Barkass Miss Emma Wright
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim concerned whether the claimants were contractually entitled to normal hourly pay as well as the bank holiday enhancement when required to work bank holiday hours above their contracted 36 hours per week. The parties accepted that the claimants worked more than their contracted hours in those circumstances and had received the bank holiday enhancement but not normal hourly pay for the additional hours.
The tribunal found that the claimants were contractually entitled to be paid for additional time worked above 36 hours when their manager required them to work it. It found that, although their contracts and role documents expected bank holiday and unsocial hours working, there was no expectation that employees at their grade should work more than 36 hours without overtime compensation.
The tribunal concluded that bank holiday overtime should be paid at double time, and that the respondent had not processed the additional bank holiday hours as overtime. It awarded Mr Barkass £1,138.99 for bank holiday dates from May 2023 onwards, plus a 10% shift allowance, making £1,252.89. The remainder of the claim was stayed pending the appeal discussed in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment covers two claimants under case numbers 2300121/2025 and 2300122/2025. For case 2300121/2025, Mr Barkass was awarded £1,252.89 for the two-year back pay period. The part of the claim preceding the two-year period was stayed pending the outcome of the appeal discussed in the reasons. | Upheld | — | £1,253 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,253
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Afshar and ors v Addison Lee Ltd ET Case No.3306435/20
- 2-year statutory limit on unlawful deduction of wages
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.